Stewart McKelvey - When results count.
Home > Publications > 2002 Archive > Event Data Recorders
Event Data Recorders

Event Data Recorders
25-Feb-2002

As a result of a tragic motor vehicle accident which occurred recently in Nova Scotia, the media have published several articles referring to "event data recorders" (EDRs) which are present in some of today’s motor vehicles.

EDRs are becoming more common and they can, in some circumstances, provide valuable information as to events leading up to a motor vehicle accident. It is thus essential that people who deal with motor vehicle accident claims and litigation understand what EDRs are, where and when to look for them, what data they may offer, and how to access and preserve this data so that it can be used in adjusting claims and in litigation.

What is an Event Data Recorder?

EDRs were developed by the automotive industry as part of the air bag supplementary restraint system. Early EDRs monitored vehicle speed and force of impact to determine whether air bags were deployed. As technology evolved, EDRs were designed to read and record more information.

Currently, there are motor vehicles equipped with EDRs that record speed, whether the vehicle is accelerating or braking, whether the seat belt is buckled, and whether the air bag is deployed. Every five seconds this information is over-written unless there is a collision that triggers the air bag. If such a collision occurs, the information on the EDR is locked permanently into its memory and can be retrieved for analysis and investigation. An EDR can thus give an accident investigator key information about the vehicle in the five seconds prior to impact.

Benefits and Obstacles to Using Information from EDRs

The benefits of such precise and detailed information in claims and litigation are obvious. There are, however, some things every accident investigator and claims examiner should know about EDRs.

Lack of Regulation

Currently, there is no legislation regulating the installation or design of EDRs. As a result, an EDR will not always be available; and if it is available, it will not necessarily contain the same data as another vehicle’s EDR. We do know that major manufacturers such as General Motors are installing EDRs, and it is safe to assume that EDRs will continue to evolve to store more and more types of data.

Quality of Information

At present, a typical EDR will only provide useful information if the accident was one which caused the air bag to deploy. An EDR will thus not be useful in a minor collision. In addition, the typical EDR will only provide data covering the five seconds prior to air bag deployment. In cases where there was a delayed deployment, or a second impact, an EDR will not necessarily provide the most relevant information.

Retrieval of Information

Once you have determined that a subject vehicle has an EDR, how does it tell its story? Currently, EDR data can be downloaded and analysed only by the vehicle manufacturer. In some cases, police investigators might take the EDR into their own possession and enlist the manufacturer’s assistance. In other cases, it will be up to the accident investigator and claims examiner to follow up on this. If the matter proceeds to litigation, it may be possible to force a manufacturer to disclose the EDR’s information, particularly in Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and other provinces with procedures to compel discovery and disclosure by non-parties.

Admissibility of EDR information

Once the EDR data is available, it can be added to other information obtained by the investigator and examiner to form part of the basis for making a decision on the claim. If the matter proceeds to litigation, the question becomes whether the EDR data will be admissible and reliable at trial.

Currently, there are no reported decisions in Canada in which EDR data has been used in litigation. Data retrieved from similar devices, such as an airplane’s "black box" and like devices installed on trains have been accepted as evidence in both Canadian and US courts.

There is only one reported decision in the United States in which EDR-type data was accepted by the Court. In Ruby Harris v. General Motors Corporation, 2000 FED App. 0039P (6th Cir.) Harris appealed a summary judgment to GM arising from an accident in which the deployment of Harris’ air bag caused her injury. The issue in that was the timing of the air bag deployment. GM presented an Affidavit of one of its engineers in which he referred to downloaded data from a device onboard Harris’ vehicle known as a "diagnostic energy reserve module" or DERM. The engineer likened the DERM to an airplane’s black box. The DERM monitored the air bag system for malfunctions and warned the operator by controlling the air bag warning light on the instrument panel. The GM engineer stated that the DERM data suggested that the air bag deployed during the plaintiff’s accident. The court accepted this evidence, but held it was not conclusive proof of the timing of the air bag deployment.

This decision makes it clear that while it is helpful and worthwhile to obtain EDR data after a motor vehicle accident, that data will not necessarily be conclusive proof of matters such as vehicle speed prior to impact, and thus it will still be necessary to conduct more traditional post-accident investigations such as reconstructions and impact analyses, with EDR data (when available) a very helpful and effective way of corroborating expert conclusions.

While no Canadian court has yet considered EDR evidence we anticipate it would have to be introduced through the testimony of an expert or experts qualified in retrieving, decoding and interpreting EDR data, on the basis of a firm foundation of factual evidence on matters such as when the airbag deployed.

Conclusion and Recommendations

EDRs are certain to become more common and more informative. Therefore, accident investigators and claims examiners should make sure they ask these questions in every motor vehicle accident claim:

  1. Did the accident cause an air bag to deploy in any of the involved vehicles?
  2. If so, was that vehicle equipped with an EDR?
  3. Is it possible to determine at what point in the collision the air bag deployed?
  4. What sort of data is collected by the type of EDR in the subject vehicle?
  5. Are the police attempting to access the EDR’s data and, if so, are they willing to disclose it to the interested parties and their insurers?
  6. If not, can the vehicle manufacturer be enlisted to retrieve the EDR and access its data?

We expect that EDR technology will continue to move forward at a rapid rate, and it is only a matter of time before Canadian and American courts are asked to consider this sort of evidence in motor vehicle accident litigation. Accident investigators and claims examiners must therefore be sure to find out whether this sort of data might be available in any accident involving air bag - equipped vehicles.

We encourage you to contact the lawyers shown below with any questions about the contents of this Client Update.

  Direct DialE-mail Address 
Halifax, Nova Scotia  
Carman McCormick902.420.3318smss.com
Mick Ryan, Q.C.902.420.3316smss.com
David Miller, Q.C.902.420.3319smss.com
Jonathan Stobie, Q.C.902.420.3323smss.com
Robert Grant, Q.C.902.420.3328smss.com
Nancy Murray902.420.3334smss.com
Art Barry902.420.3364smss.com
Scott Norton902.420.3349smss.com
Geoff Machum902.420.3338smss.com
John Rogers902.420.3340smss.com
David Farrar902.420.3362smss.com
Virve Sandstrom902.420.3363smss.com
Rory Rogers902.420.3369smss.com
James Chipman902.420.3368smss.com
Nancy Rubin902.420.3337smss.com
Richard Southcott902.420.3304smss.com
John MacDonell902.420.3393smss.com
Dennise Mack902.420.3391smss.com
Sheree Conlon902.420.3375smss.com
Christa Hellstrom902.420.3331smss.com
Tricia Avery902.420.3350smss.com
Scott Barnett902.420.3355smss.com
Leah Hutt902.420.3360smss.com
Colin Piercey902.420.3345smss.com
Peter Johnson902.420.3341smss.com
Karen Bennett-Clayton902.420.3377smss.com
Carrie Ricker902.420.3382smss.com
   
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island 
Alan Scales, C.M., Q.C.902.629.4500 smss.com
Eugene Rossiter, Q.C.902.629.4502 smss.com
Keith Boswell902.629.4511 smss.com
Sean Casey902.629.4512 smss.com
Spencer Campbell902.629.4549 smss.com
Tracey Clements902.629.4538 smss.com
   
Saint John, New Brunswick
Kenneth McCullogh, Q.C.506.632.2781smss.com
Gregory Sinclair506.632.2782smss.com
Stephen Hutchison506.632.2784smss.com
Christopher Stewart506.632.2760smss.com
Paul Harquail506.632.8313smss.com
Cynthia Benson506.632.8301smss.com
Catherine Lahey506.632.8307smss.com
Chantal Daigle506.632.2761smss.com
Jeffrey Parker506.632.2779smss.com
Janet Thompson506.637.9230smss.com
   
Moncton, New Brunswick
Levi Clain, Q.C.506.853.1979smss.com
Charles LeBlond, Q.C.506.853.1976smss.com
André Richard506.853.1962smss.com
Stephen McNally506.383.2221 smss.com
Marie-Claude Bélanger-Richard506.853.1972 smss.com
Jolène Richard506.383.2222 smss.com 
Luc Elsliger506.383.2232smss.com
Robert Dysart506.383.2230smss.com
Lucie LaBoissonnière506.853.1971smss.com
   
Fredericton, New Brunswick
Gérard La Forest, C.C., Q.C.506.443.0135smss.com
Fred McElman506.444.8979smss.com
Hugh Cameron506.443.0120smss.com
Heather Hobart506.443.0132smss.com
Heather Black506.443.0157smss.com
   
St. John's, Newfoundland
Michael Harrington, Q.C.709.570.8848smss.com
Lewis Andrews, Q.C.709.570.8822smss.com
Geoffrey Brown709.570.8845smss.com
Janet Henley Andrews, Q.C.709.570.8843smss.com
Kenneth Templeton, Q.C.709.570.8893smss.com
William Goodridge, Q.C.709.570.8823smss.com
Colm Seviour709.570.8847smss.com
Wayne Bruce709.570.8897smss.com
Daniel Boone709.570.8879smss.com
Paul Coxworthy709.570.8830smss.com
Cecily Strickland709.570.8826smss.com
Rodney Zdebiak709.570.8841smss.com
Robert Dillon709.570.8894smss.com
Stephen Penney709.570.8881smss.com
Christine Healy709.570.8833smss.com
Janie Bussey709.570.8891smss.com
Margaret Gillies709.570.8840smss.com
Susan Norman709.570.8831smss.com
Gerry Fleming709.570.8836smss.com
Kimberley Walsh709.570.8834smss.com
Tracey Primmer709.570.8828smss.com


Back